Key result
Class imbalance drives low precision in 30-day HF readmission models, highlighting the need for precision-recall curves.
Why the study?
Despite numerous models developed to predict unplanned 30-day readmission in patients discharged with heart failure, predictive success has remained meager.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Alternative metrics like partial C-statistics and precision-recall curves may provide a more accurate evaluation of predictive models for 30-day heart failure readmissions than traditional ROC curves.
The prevention of unplanned 30-day readmissions of patients discharged with a diagnosis of heart failure (HF) remains a profound challenge among hospital enterprises. Despite the many models and indices developed to predict which HF patients will readmit for any unplanned cause within 30 days, predictive success has been meager. Using simulations of HF readmission models and the diagnostics most often used to evaluate them (C-statistics, ROC curves), we demonstrate common factors that have contributed to the lack of predictive success among studies. We reveal a greater need for precision and alternative metrics such as partial C-statistics and precision-recall curves and demonstrate via simulations how those tools can be used to better gauge predictive success. We suggest how studies can improve their applicability to hospitals and call for a greater understanding of the uncertainty underlying 30-day all-cause HF readmission. Finally, using insights from sampling theory, we suggest a novel uncertainty-based perspective for predicting readmissions and non-readmissions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Locey et al. (2021) conducted a review in Heart failure. Predictive models was evaluated. Predictive models for 30-day heart failure readmissions frequently exhibit low precision due to class imbalance, highlighting the need for precision-recall curves and an uncertainty-based perspective.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: