Key result
Early thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction was assessed via systematic review and economic evaluation, but the abstract provides no specific clinical or economic findings.
Why the study?
Does early thrombolysis improve outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Does early thrombolysis improve outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
This paper presents a systematic review and economic evaluation of early thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Does not alter practice; leaves open the cost-effectiveness of early thrombolysis in acute MI.
No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boland et al. (2003) studied this question. Early thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction was assessed via systematic review and economic evaluation, but the abstract provides no specific clinical or economic findings.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: