Key result
Careful clinical interviewing, submaximal exercise testing, and motion sensors are recommended as useful, simple, noninvasive alternatives for assessing physical activity in chronic heart failure.
Why the study?
What are simple, noninvasive methods to assess physical activity in patients with chronic heart failure?
What are simple, noninvasive methods to assess physical activity in patients with chronic heart failure?
Simple, noninvasive tools like walk tests, pedometers, and the Master-Borg test are practical and useful for assessing physical activity and symptoms in patients with chronic heart failure.
May aid clinicians assessing activity in chronic HF; leaves open need for prospective validation.
This article reviews simple, noninvasive ways to assess physical activity in patients with chronic heart failure. Six- or 9-minute walk tests appear to be useful not only for selecting patients with relatively advanced heart failure but also as prognostic screening tests. The Master-Borg test (Master's two-step testing and 10-point Borg scale) is useful for assessing symptoms during exercise. Weekly pedometer counts show that the level of activity in patients with heart failure is dramatically less than in healthy controls. Physical activity can be determined directly by an ambulatory calorie counter that measures step scores and energy expenditure using specific accelerometers. Careful clinical interviewing regarding symptoms, together with submaximal exercise testing and use of motion sensors, are recommended as useful, simple, noninvasive alternatives for assessing physical activity in this patient population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Asakuma et al. (2000) conducted a review in Chronic Heart Failure. Simple methods of assessing physical activity was evaluated. Careful clinical interviewing, submaximal exercise testing, and motion sensors are recommended as useful, simple, noninvasive alternatives for assessing physical activity in chronic heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: