Key result
CAAN-AF trial tests if AV node ablation reduces mortality and HF events ~25% vs rate control.
Why the study?
Patients with AF appear to benefit less from CRT than those in sinus rhythm, and randomized trial evidence for the effect of AV node ablation on CRT efficacy is lacking.
Does AV node ablation reduce the composite of all-cause mortality and non-fatal heart failure events in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation and HFrEF receiving a CRT-defibrillator?
RCT (n=590)
1:1
Does AV node ablation reduce the composite of all-cause mortality and non-fatal heart failure events in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation and HFrEF receiving a CRT-defibrillator?
The CAAN-AF trial is designed to determine whether AV node ablation improves clinical outcomes compared to medical rate control in patients with permanent AF and HFrEF receiving CRT.
Will test AV node ablation versus rate control on mortality and HF events in permanent AF with HFrEF on CRT; provides first randomized evidence.
Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an important treatment modality for patients with symptomatic heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and QRS prolongation on electrocardiogram. However, patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) appear to benefit less from CRT compared to patients in sinus rhythm. Atrioventricular (AV) node ablation has been shown in observational studies to improve the efficacy of CRT in patients with AF. Objective: We aimed to evaluate the effect of AV node ablation on CRT efficacy in patients with permanent AF. Methods: Participants with permanent AF and a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (≤35%) who receive a CRT-defibrillator are randomized in a 1:1 fashion to AV node ablation or medical rate control for treatment of AF. A sample size of 590 participants allows a detection of a 25% reduction in the primary end point at 80% power. Results: The primary end point is a composite of all-cause mortality and non-fatal HF events after 2 years of follow-up. The secondary end points include all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, non-fatal HF events, 6-minute walking distance, quality-of-life, unscheduled hospitalizations, ventricular arrhythmias requiring device therapies, and biventricular pacing percentage. Conclusion: The CRT And AV Node ablation trial in AF (CAAN-AF) will be the first randomized controlled trial to investigate the effect of AV node ablation on CRT efficacy in patients with AF and HFrEF. The results will guide physicians regarding the use of AV node ablation for patients with CRT and AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sanders et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and permanent atrial fibrillation (n=590). AV node ablation vs. Medical rate control was evaluated on Composite of all-cause mortality and non-fatal HF events.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: