Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The article analyzes and compares personal data anonymization methods using k-anonymity, ℓ-diversity, and t-closeness as examples. The aim of the research is to evaluate the effectiveness of these methods in ensuring data privacy and identifying their vulnerabilities to re-identification attacks. The study was performed using the ARX Anonymization Tool on a test dataset containing personal income information. The authors analyzed the impact of changes in key parameters of anonymization methods on data privacy and informativeness. It was determined that the t-closeness method provides the highest effectiveness in terms of protecting confidentiality, although its application significantly reduces the granularity of information. At the same time, the k-anonymity method, despite being less resistant to attacks, provides better practical utility of anonymized data. The ℓ-diversity method demonstrates moderate effectiveness in terms of both privacy protection and informativeness. This research allowed quantitative assessment of the balance between data confidentiality and utility, facilitating a more informed choice of optimal anonymization parameters depending on specific tasks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Іванюк et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: