Key result
Early revascularization is linked to a trend toward ~41% lower MACE in ischaemic cardiomyopathy with >10% ischaemia.
Why the study?
Limited data exist regarding the interaction between ischaemia and early coronary revascularization (ECR) in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy (ICM), and the burden of ischaemia is not systematically tested when deciding on revascularization.
Does early coronary revascularization reduce major cardiovascular events in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy, and is this effect modified by the burden of ischaemia?
Cohort (n=747)
Does early coronary revascularization reduce major cardiovascular events in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy, and is this effect modified by the burden of ischaemia?
Early coronary revascularization may reduce major cardiovascular events in ischemic cardiomyopathy patients specifically when the ischemic burden exceeds 10%, supporting an ischemia-guided revascularization approach.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports ischemia-guided strategies in ischaemic cardiomyopathy; hypothesis-generating pending randomized confirmation.
AIMS: The burden of ischaemia is a risk factor for adverse outcomes in ischaemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) but is not systematically tested when deciding on revascularization. Limited data exists in patients with ICM regarding the interaction between ischaemia and early coronary revascularization (ECR). This study sought to determine if the burden of ischaemia modifies the outcomes of ECR in ICM. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients with ICM (left ventricular ejection fraction < 40%) with a stress-rest gated single-photon emission computed tomography (N = 747) were followed-up for ECR and major cardiovascular events (MACEs, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or heart failure hospitalization). A 1:1 matched population was selected using a propensity score for ECR. The interaction between ischaemia and ECR was evaluated in the matched cohort. In the initial cohort, 131 patients underwent ECR. Of them, 109 were matched to non-ECR patients. After a median follow up of 4.1 years, 102 (46.8%) patients experienced a MACE. The effect of revascularization on MACE was dependent of the percent of ischaemia (P for the interaction at 10% ischaemia = 0.021), so that a trend towards a decreased risk of MACE was seen in patients with >10% of ischaemia [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.59 (0.30-1.18)], whereas a non-significant increase of MACE was observed in those with <10% ischaemia (HR = 1.67 [0.94-2.96]). CONCLUSIONS: In a contemporary cohort of patients with ICM, the beneficial effects of ECR may be mediated by the percent of ischaemia. This study supports stress testing in ICM and an ischaemia-guided approach for ECR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ródenas‐Alesina et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Ischaemic cardiomyopathy (n=747). Early coronary revascularization vs. No early coronary revascularization was evaluated on Major cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or heart failure hospitalization) (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.30-1.18, p=0.021 for interaction). Early coronary revascularization in ischaemic cardiomyopathy showed a trend toward decreased MACE in patients with >10% ischaemia (HR 0.59; 95% CI 0.30-1.18; P=0.021 for interaction).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: