Key result
LBBAP+ linked to shorter left ventricular activation time versus LBBAP- in normal QRS patients.
Why the study?
Left bundle branch area pacing is an innovative pacing technology that requires further study.
Does achieving a positive left bundle branch potential during LBBAP improve electrical and mechanical characteristics in patients with normal intrinsic QRS duration?
Observational (n=70)
No
Does achieving a positive left bundle branch potential during LBBAP improve electrical and mechanical characteristics in patients with normal intrinsic QRS duration?
In patients with normal intrinsic QRS duration undergoing LBBAP, achieving a left bundle branch potential results in better left ventricular electrical synchronicity but similar mechanical synchronization compared to those without the potential.
LBBAP with positive potential was associated with shorter LV activation time in normal-QRS patients; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
BACKGROUND: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is an innovative pacing technology, which needs further study. METHODS: Seventy LBBAP patients with intrinsic QRS duration (QRSd) less than 120 ms were consecutively enrolled in our center. According to whether the left bundle branch potential (LBBp) was recorded or not, the patients were divided into the potential positive group (LBBAP+) and the potential negative group (LBBAP-). Electrocardiographic and echocardiographic parameters were used to evaluate electrical and mechanical characteristics. Lead parameters and complications were followed-up. RESULTS: There were 52 patients in LBBAP+ and 18 patients in LBBAP-. The QRSd and the left ventricular activation time (LVAT) were wider after LBBAP. QRSd showed no significant difference between LBBAP+ and LBBAP-. LVAT was significantly shorter in LBBAP+ than in LBBAP-. Frontal QRS axis shifted leftward and the V1 morphologies changed after LBBAP. QRS axis and V1 morphologies showed no significant differences between two groups. Paced R-wave transition moved forward compared with intrinsic R-wave transition in both groups. Peak systolic strain of left ventricle (LVPSS) increased, and peak systolic dispersion of left ventricle (LVPSD) did not change significantly after LBBAP. Systolic and diastolic function as well as mechanical synchronism had no significant differences between two groups. LBBAP had great pacing parameters. CONCLUSION: LBBAP changes electrical and mechanical characteristics and has good safety in patients with normal intrinsic QRSd. LBBAP+ and LBBAP- show no significant differences in mechanical synchronization and interventricular electrical synchronization. The LBBAP+ shows better left ventricular electrical synchronicity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Normal intrinsic QRS duration requiring pacing (n=70). Left bundle branch area pacing with potential (LBBAP+) vs. Left bundle branch area pacing without potential (LBBAP-) was evaluated on Electrical and mechanical characteristics. LBBAP in patients with normal QRS duration (<120 ms) altered electrical characteristics, with LBBAP+ (n=52) showing significantly shorter left ventricular activation time than LBBAP- (n=18).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: