Key result
Sonomicrometry-based mapping accurately reconstructed 3D voltage maps of infarcted ventricular myocardium, correlating highly with gross pathology for endocardial scar area.
Why the study?
Does a sonomicrometry-based electroanatomic mapping system accurately render endocardial and epicardial substrate maps of infarcted ventricular myocardium in swine compared to a magnetic mapping system and gross pathology?
Does a sonomicrometry-based electroanatomic mapping system accurately render endocardial and epicardial substrate maps of infarcted ventricular myocardium in swine compared to a magnetic mapping system and gross pathology?
Sonomicrometry-based mapping can accurately reconstruct 3D voltage maps of endocardial and epicardial ventricular surfaces and guide ablation lesions in a swine model of healed myocardial infarction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Sonomicrometry mapping feasible in swine infarct models; leaves open human substrate validation and clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND: Substrate mapping using a magnetic electroanatomical mapping system (MEAM) has been shown to accurately delineate the location/extent of scarred myocardium. This study examined the ability of a sonomicrometry-based electroanatomic mapping system (SEAM) to render endocardial and epicardial substrate maps of infarcted ventricular myocardium. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 7 swine with healed myocardial infarctions, combined epicardial and endocardial left ventricular (LV) substrate maps were created with both SEAM and MEAM mapping systems using 246+/-68 and 244+/-44 points respectively. Scarred myocardium was identified based upon bipolar electrogram amplitude < 1.5 mV, and radiofrequency ablation lesions were delivered to the scar border as defined by the sonomicrometry mapping system. The LV endocardial chamber volume as defined by SEAM (125+/-46 ml) correlated well with that defined by the MEAM (137+/-45 ml, r=0.77, p < 0.05). The area of infarcted tissue as determined by SEAM was highly correlated with that determined by gross pathology (r=0.96 for endocardial scar and r=0.92 for epicardial scar p < 0.05). The scar area calculated by the SEAM system also correlated well with the scar area determined by the MEAM system (0.91 for endocardial scar and 0.90 for epicardial scar p < 0.05). Finally, the sonomicrometry-based system was able to guide the placement of radiofrequency ablation lesions to the borders of the scar. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the sonomicrometry-based mapping can accurately reconstruct three-dimensional voltage maps of the endocardial and epicardial ventricular surfaces and guide the placement of ablation lesions along the scar border zone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
AVILA et al. (2007) studied Healed myocardial infarctions (n=7). Sonomicrometry-based electroanatomic mapping system (SEAM) vs. Magnetic electroanatomical mapping system (MEAM) and gross pathology was evaluated on Correlation of infarcted tissue area with gross pathology (r=0.96 (endocardial), r=0.92 (epicardial), p=< 0.05). Sonomicrometry-based mapping accurately reconstructed 3D voltage maps of infarcted ventricular myocardium, correlating highly with gross pathology for endocardial scar area.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: