Key result
METS achieves ~84% accuracy in zero-shot ECG classification, outperforming the SimCLR baseline.
Why the study?
Current self-supervised learning methods for ECG classification rely on annotated data for fine-tuning and cannot predict labels absent from those datasets.
Does Multimodal ECG-Text Self-supervised pre-training (METS) improve zero-shot classification performance of ECGs compared to baseline models?
Does Multimodal ECG-Text Self-supervised pre-training (METS) improve zero-shot classification performance of ECGs compared to baseline models?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.842% vs 0.648%
Multimodal self-supervised learning using auto-generated clinical reports and a frozen language model significantly improves zero-shot ECG classification performance.
May facilitate annotation-free ECG diagnostics; leaves open prospective clinical validation before adoption.
The electrocardiogram (ECG) is one of the most commonly used non-invasive, convenient medical monitoring tools that assist in the clinical diagnosis of heart diseases. Recently, deep learning (DL) techniques, particularly self-supervised learning (SSL), have demonstrated great potential in the classification of ECG. SSL pre-training has achieved competitive performance with only a small amount of annotated data after fine-tuning. However, current SSL methods rely on the availability of annotated data and are unable to predict labels not existing in fine-tuning datasets. To address this challenge, we propose Multimodal ECG-Text Self-supervised pre-training (METS), the first work to utilize the auto-generated clinical reports to guide ECG SSL pre-training. We use a trainable ECG encoder and a frozen language model to embed paired ECG and automatically machine-generated clinical reports separately. The SSL aims to maximize the similarity between paired ECG and auto-generated report while minimize the similarity between ECG and other reports. In downstream classification tasks, METS achieves around 10% improvement in performance without using any annotated data via zero-shot classification, compared to other supervised and SSL baselines that rely on annotated data. Furthermore, METS achieves the highest recall and F1 scores on the MIT-BIH dataset, despite MIT-BIH containing different classes of ECG compared to the pre-trained dataset. The extensive experiments have demonstrated the advantages of using ECG-Text multimodal self-supervised learning in terms of generalizability, effectiveness, and efficiency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2023) studied Electrocardiogram (ECG) classification (n=18,885). Multimodal ECG-Text Self-supervised pre-training (METS) vs. SimCLR (self-supervised) and ResNet-18 (supervised) was evaluated on Accuracy on PTB-XL diagnostic superclass classification. The Multimodal ECG-Text Self-supervised pre-training (METS) method achieved 84.2% accuracy in zero-shot ECG diagnostic superclass classification, outperforming the SimCLR baseline.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: