Key result
Random forest-based closed-loop neurofeedback achieves ~79% monitoring accuracy and improves attention performance.
Why the study?
Existing attention studies have low accuracy in attention monitoring and inefficiency during attention training in young adults.
Does an IRF-algorithm-based attention monitoring and training method with closed-loop neurofeedback improve attention in young adults?
Does an IRF-algorithm-based attention monitoring and training method with closed-loop neurofeedback improve attention in young adults?
p-value: p=<0.05
An improved random forest algorithm with closed-loop neurofeedback provides reliable attention monitoring and effective attention training in young adults.
May support attention training in young adults; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized validation before practice change.
Attention is an important mechanism for young adults, whose lives largely involve interacting with media and performing technology multitasking. Nevertheless, the existing studies related to attention are characterized by low accuracy and poor attention levels in terms of attention monitoring and inefficiency during attention training. In this paper, we propose an improved random forest- (IRF-) algorithm-based attention monitoring and training method with closed-loop neurofeedback. For attention monitoring, an IRF classifier that uses grid search optimization and multiple cross-validation to improve monitoring accuracy and performance is utilized, and five attention levels are proposed. For attention training, we develop three training modes with neurofeedback corresponding to sustained attention, selective attention, and focus attention and apply a self-control method with four indicators to validate the resulting training effect. An offline experiment based on the Personal EEG Concentration Tasks dataset and an online experiment involving 10 young adults are conducted. The results show that our proposed IRF-algorithm-based attention monitoring approach achieves an average accuracy of 79.34%, thereby outperforming the current state-of-the-art algorithms. Furthermore, when excluding familiarity with the game environment, statistically significant performance improvements ( <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M1"> <a:mi>p</a:mi> <a:mo><</a:mo> <a:mn>0.05</a:mn> </a:math> ) are achieved by the 10 young adults after attention training, which demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed serious games. Our work involving the proposed method of attention monitoring and training proves to be reliable and efficient.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2021) studied Attention monitoring and training (n=10). IRF-algorithm-based attention monitoring and training with closed-loop neurofeedback vs. Self-control was evaluated on Attention monitoring accuracy (p=<0.05). An improved random forest-based attention monitoring and training method with closed-loop neurofeedback achieved 79.34% accuracy and significantly improved attention performance (p<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: