In a previous paper (Green, 2002 Green, K. (2002). Physical education and ‘the couch potato society’. European Journal of Physical Education, 7(2): 95–107. [Taylor & Francis Online] , [Google Scholar]), it was argued that official and semi-official rhetoric related to school sport and PE in recent years has failed to consider adequately, or often acknowledge, trends in sport and physical activity and lifestyle developments among young people and adults. This sequel focuses attention upon the significance of the wider dimensions of young people's lives for their current and future patterns of participation in sport and physical activity. The paper concludes that if, as seems to be the case, facilitating lifelong participation is viewed as a primary aim of the subject then PE needs to move with the prevailing tide of young people's leisure lifestyles by catering for their preferences for a wider range of activities in more informal and individual and small-group settings. Consequently, there would need to be a shift in emphasis in policy and practice away from concentration on competitive, performance-oriented sport in PE (Penney & Harris, 1997 Penney, D and Harris, J. (1997). Extra-curricular physical education: more of the same for the more able?. Sport, Education and Society, 2(1): 41–54. [Taylor & Francis Online] , [Google Scholar]; Penney & Evans, 1999 Penney D Evans J (1999) Politics, policy and practice in Physical Education London E. & F. N. Spon [Crossref] , [Google Scholar]) and towards the kinds of ‘optional’, recreational, lifestyle-oriented sports and physical activities that appear more likely to lead to the wide sporting repertoires (Roberts & Brodie, 1992 Roberts K Brodie D (1992) Inner-city sport Culemborg Giordano Bruno [Google Scholar]) essential for lifelong participation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ken Green (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: