Dynamic exercise in patients with coronary artery disease induced coronary vasodilation of normal segments (+23%, P<0.001) and vasoconstriction of stenotic segments (-29%, P<0.001).
Observational (n=25)
Does dynamic exercise alter coronary vasomotor tone in patients with normal coronary arteries or coronary artery disease?
Dynamic exercise induces paradoxical vasoconstriction in stenotic coronary arteries and in the small arteries of a subset of patients with normal coronaries and reduced flow reserve.
p-value: p=<0.001
Coronary vasomotion is an important determinant of myocardial perfusion in patients with angina pectoris, and it influences not only normal but also stenotic coronary arteries. The ability of a stenotic coronary artery to change its size is dependent on the presence of a normal musculo-elastic wall segment within the stenosis (i.e., eccentric stenosis). Coronary vasoconstriction of normal and stenotic coronary arteries has been reported by Brown and coworkers (Circulation 1984; 70: 18–24) during isometric exercise. The effect of dynamic exericse on coronary vasomotion was evaluated in one group of 13 patients with ischaemia-like symptoms and normal coronary arteries (group 1) and in a second group of 12 patients with coronary artery disease with exercise-induced angina pectoris (group 2). Luminal area of a normal and a stenotic vessel segment was determined by biplane quantitative coronary arteriography at rest, during supine bicycle exercise and 5 min after administration of 1·6 mg sublingual nitroglycerin. Coronary sinus blood flow was measured in group 1 at rest and after 0·5 mg kg−1 intravenous dipyridamole using coronary sinus thermodilution. Coronary flow reserve was calculated from coronary sinus flow after dipyridamole divided by coronary sinus flow at rest. In group 1, coronary vasodilation of the large (i.e., proximal) and the small (i.e., distal) coronary arteries was observed during exercise in seven patients (subgroup A). However, in the remaining six patients (subgroup B) coronary vasoconstriction of the small arteries (−24%, P<0·001) was found during exercise, whereas the large vessels showed coronary vasodilation (+26%, P<0·001). Coronary flow reserve was significantly (P<0·05) larger in subgroup A (mean 2·5) than in subgroup B (mean 1·2) with exercise-induced vasoconstriction of the small epicardial arteries. In group 2 vasodilation of the normal (+23%, P<0·001) and vasoconstriction of the stenotic coronary arteries (−29, P<0·001) was found during supine bicycle exercise. Administration of sublingual nitroglycerin at the end of the exercise test was accompanied by coronary vasodilation of both normal (+40%, P<0·001 vs rest) and stenotic (+12%, NS vs rest) vessel segments. It is concluded that isometric exercise is associated with reflex coronary vasoconstriction of the normal and stenotic vessel segments due to enhanced sympathetic stimulation. Dynamic exercise in patients with ischaemia-like symptoms and normal coronary arteries is accompanied by an abnormal dilatory response of the small coronary arteries in a subgroup of patients with reduced coronary flow reserve. Dynamic exercise in patients with coronary artery disease is, however, associated with coronary vasodilation of the normal and coronary vasoconstriction of the stenotic vessel segments. The nature of this exercise-induced vasoconstriction of stenotic coronary arteries is not clear, but might be related to endothelial dysfunction with an insufficient production of the endothelium-derived relaxing factor during exercise.
Hess et al. (Thu,) conducted a observational in Ischaemia-like symptoms with normal coronary arteries or coronary artery disease (n=25). Supine bicycle exercise vs. Rest was evaluated on Change in luminal area of normal and stenotic vessel segments (p=<0.001). Dynamic exercise in patients with coronary artery disease induced coronary vasodilation of normal segments (+23%, P<0.001) and vasoconstriction of stenotic segments (-29%, P<0.001).