Key result
Brisk walking pace linked to ~43% lower risk of incident cardiac arrhythmias versus slow walking.
Why the study?
Dedicated studies investigating the relationship between walking pace and cardiac arrhythmia were limited.
Does average or brisk walking pace reduce the risk of incident cardiac arrhythmias compared to slow walking pace in the general population?
Cohort (n=420,925)
Does average or brisk walking pace reduce the risk of incident cardiac arrhythmias compared to slow walking pace in the general population?
Average and brisk walking paces are associated with a significantly decreased risk of incident cardiac arrhythmias, partially mediated by metabolic and inflammatory pathways.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Brisk walking pace was associated with lower arrhythmia risk; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
OBJECTIVES: Dedicated studies aimed at investigating the relationship between walking pace and arrhythmia are limited. This study assessed associations between self-reported and accelerometer measured walking pace and incident cardiac arrhythmias, overall and by subtype, and explored metabolic and inflammatory markers as possible mediators. METHODS: Self-reported average walking pace was available for 420 925 UK Biobank participants, and accelerometer measured time spent walking at different paces was available for 81 956 participants. Outcomes were incident cardiac arrhythmias: all, atrial fibrillation (AF), other (including bradyarrhythmias and ventricular arrhythmias), bradyarrhythmias and ventricular arrhythmias. Cox proportional regression models were used to investigate the associations. RESULTS: Compared with slow walking pace, average and brisk walking pace were associated with significantly lower risks of all cardiac arrhythmias (hazard ratio (HR) 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62 to 0.68; HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.60), AF (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.65; HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.57) and other arrhythmias (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.73; HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.65). Overall, 36.0% of the association between walking pace and all arrhythmias was mediated via metabolic and inflammatory markers. The associations were stronger in women, in those aged <60 years, in those with a body mass index <30, in those who had hypertension and in those with ≥2 long term conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Average and brisk self-reported walking pace and time spent walking at moderate and brisk pace were associated with a decreased risk of cardiac arrhythmias, in part mediated via metabolic and inflammatory pathways. Our findings suggest brisk walking may be a safe and effective exercise to reduce arrhythmias, especially for higher risk groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qin et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Incident cardiac arrhythmias (n=420,925). Brisk walking pace vs. Slow walking pace was evaluated on All incident cardiac arrhythmias (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.60). Compared with a slow walking pace, a brisk walking pace was associated with a lower risk of all incident cardiac arrhythmias.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: