Key result
In a canine atrial artificial isthmus model, the block coupling interval was always longer than the effective refractory period, suggesting it better reflects the block phenomenon.
Why the study?
Does the block coupling interval (BCI) provide a more accurate measure of post-repolarization refractoriness for conduction block than the effective refractory period (ERP) in a canine atrial isthmus model?
Does the block coupling interval (BCI) provide a more accurate measure of post-repolarization refractoriness for conduction block than the effective refractory period (ERP) in a canine atrial isthmus model?
The block coupling interval (BCI) is a more accurate parameter than the effective refractory period (ERP) for evaluating post-repolarization refractoriness and conduction block in cardiac muscle.
May refine atrial conduction block assessment beyond ERP in models; leaves open human translation pending clinical studies.
Post-repolarization refractoriness (PRR) is an important factor in determining conduction block and is the difference between the effective refractory period (ERP) and the duration of the monophasic action potential (MAPD). In the present study, conduction block in an artificial isthmus in the canine atrium was evaluated and the coupling interval of a premature beat, which caused the block, was defined as the block coupling interval (BCI). The usefulness of this value was also evaluated. Radiofrequency linear ablation was performed on the right atrial surface parallel to the atrioventricular groove in 5 mongrel dogs, and an artificial isthmus (8-10mm wide and 25-30mm long) was created. Fourteen simultaneous unipolar recordings were performed in the isthmus with a resolution of 1.2 mm. Single extra-stimuli with basic drive train were delivered to induce conduction block in the isthmus and when it occurred, the coupling interval at the recording site just proximal to the site of the block was defined as the BCI. At the site of the block, the ERP and MAPD at each drive cycle length were measured. The PRR was calculated using 2 different formulae: (1) [ERP-MAPD], and (2) [BCI-MAPD]. It was found that each value was shortened in accordance with the shortening of the basic drive cycle length. In all basic drive trains, BCI>ERP>MAPD, and [ERP-MAPD] was always shorter than [BCI-MAPD]. In the shorter cycle length of basic drives, the difference between [ERP-MAPD] and [BCI-MAPD] was more prominent. In the artificial isthmus model in the canine atrium, BCI was always longer than the ERP measured at the same site as the block. Because the ERP may not directly reflect the block phenomenon, the electrophysiologic evaluation should use the BCI instead, as in the PRR evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Niwano et al. (2001) studied Conduction block (n=5). Block coupling interval (BCI) evaluation vs. Effective refractory period (ERP) evaluation was evaluated on Post-repolarization refractoriness (PRR) calculated using BCI vs ERP. In a canine atrial artificial isthmus model, the block coupling interval was always longer than the effective refractory period, suggesting it better reflects the block phenomenon.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: