Key result
A multi-sequence MRI integration framework using one mapping point achieved a mean point-to-surface distance of 5.09±1.09 mm compared to 3.85±0.60 mm with the ICP method (p<0.05).
Why the study?
Does a multi-sequence MRI integration framework using a single mapping point provide comparable LV shape and scar match to the ICP method using high-intensity mapping in patients undergoing catheter ablation for scar-related VT?
Does a multi-sequence MRI integration framework using a single mapping point provide comparable LV shape and scar match to the ICP method using high-intensity mapping in patients undergoing catheter ablation for scar-related VT?
Absolute Event Rate: 5.09% vs 3.85%
p-value: p=<0.05
A novel multi-sequence MRI integration framework using a single mapping point achieves comparable scar correlation to traditional high-density mapping methods, potentially facilitating early image guidance during VT ablation.
Single-point MRI integration yields inferior registration accuracy vs ICP; leaves open utility for scar-related VT ablation guidance.
Catheter ablation is an important option to treat ventricular tachycardias (VT). Scar-related VT is among the most difficult to treat, because myocardial scar, which is the underlying arrhythmogenic substrate, is patient-specific and often highly complex. The scar image from preprocedural late gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (LGE- MRI) can provide high-resolution substrate information and, if integrated at the early stage of the procedure, can largely facilitate the procedure with image guidance. In clinical practice, however, early MRI integration is difficult because available integration tools rely on matching the MRI surface mesh and electroanatomical mapping (EAM) points, which is only possible after extensive EAM has been performed. In this paper, we propose to use a priori information on patient posture and a multi-sequence MRI integration framework to achieve accurate MRI integration that can be accomplished at an early stage of the procedure. From the MRI sequences, the left ventricular (LV) geometry, myocardial scar characteristics, and an anatomical landmark indicating the origin of the left main coronary artery are obtained preprocedurally using image processing techniques. Thereby the integration can be realized at the beginning of the procedure after acquiring a single mapping point. The integration method has been evaluated postprocedurally in terms of LV shape match and actual scar match. Compared to the iterative closest point (ICP) method that uses high-intensity mapping (225±49 points), our method using one mapping point reached a mean point-to-surface distance of 5.09±1.09 mm (vs. 3.85±0.60 mm, p<0.05), and scar correlation of -0.51±0.14 (vs. -0.50±0.14, p=NS).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tao et al. (2012) studied Scar-related ventricular tachycardia. Multi-sequence MRI integration framework vs. Iterative closest point (ICP) method was evaluated on Mean point-to-surface distance (mm) (p=<0.05). A multi-sequence MRI integration framework using one mapping point achieved a mean point-to-surface distance of 5.09±1.09 mm compared to 3.85±0.60 mm with the ICP method (p<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: