Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The modified Cholesky factorization of Gill and Murray plays an important role in optimization algorithms. Given a symmetric but not necessarily positive-definite matrix A, it computes a Cholesky factorization of $A + E$, where $E = 0$ if A is safely positive-definite, and E is a diagonal matrix chosen to make $A + E$ positive-definite otherwise. The factorization costs only a small multiple of n² operations more than the standard Cholesky factorization. A new algorithm that has these same properties, but for which the theoretical bound on ||E||_∞ is substantially smaller, is presented. It is based upon two new techniques, the use of Gerschgorin bounds in selecting the elements of E, and a new way of monitoring positive definiteness. In extensive computational tests on indefinite matrices, the new factorization virtually always produces smaller values of ||E||_∞ than the existing method, without impairing the conditioning of $A + E$. In some cases the improvements are substantial. The new factorization has already been useful in optimization algorithms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schnabel et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: