EEG signal classification of mental stress levels during a virtual reality session achieved an accuracy of 96.42% using multilayer perceptron and Support Vector Machine classifiers.
Observational (n=28)
Can EEG signals accurately classify mental stress levels during a virtual reality session in healthy adults?
EEG signals can accurately classify mental stress levels in a virtual reality environment using machine learning algorithms.
This paper investigates the use of an electroencephalogram (EEG) signal to classify a subject’s stress level while using virtual reality (VR). For this purpose, we designed an acquisition protocol based on alternating relaxing and stressful scenes in the form of a VR interactive simulation, accompanied by an EEG headset to monitor the subject’s psycho-physical condition. Relaxation scenes were developed based on scenarios created for psychotherapy treatment utilizing bilateral stimulation, while the Stroop test worked as a stressor. The experiment was conducted on a group of 28 healthy adult volunteers (office workers), participating in a VR session. Subjects’ EEG signal was continuously monitored using the EMOTIV EPOC Flex wireless EEG head cap system. After the session, volunteers were asked to re-fill questionnaires regarding the current stress level and mood. Then, we classified the stress level using a convolutional neural network (CNN) and compared the classification performance with conventional machine learning algorithms. The best results were obtained considering all brain waves (96.42%) with a multilayer perceptron (MLP) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifiers.
Kamińska et al. (Thu,) conducted a observational in Mental stress (n=28). EEG signal classification during virtual reality was evaluated on Classification accuracy of stress level. EEG signal classification of mental stress levels during a virtual reality session achieved an accuracy of 96.42% using multilayer perceptron and Support Vector Machine classifiers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: