Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis of tax competition shows geographical impacts on revenue between small and large countries.
This paper analyses commodity tax competition between two neighboring countries whose governments are tax‐revenue maximizers in a two‐dimensional market. The results suggest three conclusions in a geographical sense. First, a small country sets a lower tax than does a big country, and per capita revenue of the small country is larger than that of the big country. Second, these two countries are subject to severer competitive pressure in the case of a more curved national border. Finally, the impact of border curvature on tax and revenue differences are always opposite in sign with the impact on tax and revenue ratios.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ohsawa et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: