The public sector must reinvent itself as modern complexities require governance and management styles, enabling more agile and network-based collaboration. The Teal paradigm (Laloux 2014) has self-management (coordinated local autonomy), evolutionary purpose (a sense of meaning), and wholeness (trust enabling being present as a ‘whole’ human being) can foster innovation, agility, and effectiveness in the private sector. This raises an intriguing question: Can the Teal paradigm be operationalized, describing Teal-public governance and leadership and thereby supporting the public sector’s efforts to produce welfare in a complex society? First, the article makes a theoretical contribution by operationalizing the three Teal characteristics into 12 variable specifications. Subsequently, examples from a trust experiment in a Danish municipality illustrate how Teal-operationalization can facilitate the development of a teal praxis. Finally, the pertinences of the operationalizations for research and praxis are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lykke Mose (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: