Key result
Higher Age-Shock Index is linked to ~4.4-fold higher in-hospital MACE after STEMI PCI.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to validate Age-Shock Index and Age-Modified Shock Index as alternatives to the GRACE score for predicting in-hospital outcomes in STEMI patients undergoing percutaneous revascularization.
Do simple bedside age-adjusted shock indices (Age-SI and Age-MSI) predict in-hospital MACE and mortality comparably to the GRACE score in STEMI patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
Observational (n=236)
No
Do simple bedside age-adjusted shock indices (Age-SI and Age-MSI) predict in-hospital MACE and mortality comparably to the GRACE score in STEMI patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
Age-SI and Age-MSI offer simple, validated bedside risk stratification tools for predicting in-hospital adverse events in PCI-treated STEMI patients, performing comparably to the more complex GRACE score.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support bedside MACE prediction with Age-SI in STEMI PCI; extends indices but leaves open prospective validation.
The ASPIRE-STEMI study prospectively evaluated 236 patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous revascularization to validate Age-Shock Index (Age-SI) and Age-Modified Shock Index (Age-MSI) as alternatives to the GRACE score for predicting in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and all-cause mortality. For MACE (n = 60), optimal cut-offs yielded sensitivities/specificities of 76.7 %/67 % (Age-SI ≥ 36.95), 85 %/56.2 % (Age-MSI ≥45.64), and 60 %/81.9 % (GRACE ≥127.5). For all-cause mortality (n = 17), optimal cut-offs yielded sensitivity/specificity of 82.4 %/83 % (Age-SI ≥46.83), 77 %/89 % (Age-MSI ≥67.35), and 94 %/76.7 % (GRACE ≥127.5). While each index independently predicted in-hospital outcomes, Age-SI and Age-MSI offer simple, bedside risk stratification in Indian STEMI patients post-PCI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koithara et al. (2025) conducted an observational in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=236). Age-Shock Index (Age-SI) and Age-Modified Shock Index (Age-MSI) vs. GRACE score was evaluated on In-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (OR 4.42, 95% CI 1.96-9.98, p=<0.001). Age-Shock Index (Age-SI) served as an independent predictor of in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (OR 4.42), performing comparably to the GRACE score in STEMI patients undergoing PCI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: