Why the study?
Does incorporating an annotation guideline improve the accuracy of large language models in extracting imaging findings from stroke CT reports?
Does incorporating an annotation guideline improve the accuracy of large language models in extracting imaging findings from stroke CT reports?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Providing well-defined annotation guidelines in the prompt significantly enhances the precision of large language models when extracting imaging findings from stroke CT reports.
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the impact of an annotation guideline on the performance of large language models (LLMs) in extracting data from stroke computed tomography (CT) reports. METHODS: The performance of GPT-4o and Llama-3.3-70B in extracting ten imaging findings from stroke CT reports was assessed in two datasets from a single academic stroke center. Dataset A (n = 200) was a stratified cohort including various pathological findings, whereas dataset B (n = 100) was a consecutive cohort. Initially, an annotation guideline providing clear data extraction instructions was designed based on a review of cases with inter-annotator disagreements in dataset A. For each LLM, data extraction was performed under two conditions: with the annotation guideline included in the prompt and without it. RESULTS: GPT-4o consistently demonstrated superior performance over Llama-3.3-70B under identical conditions, with micro-averaged precision ranging from 0.83 to 0.95 for GPT-4o and from 0.65 to 0.86 for Llama-3.3-70B. Across both models and both datasets, incorporating the annotation guideline into the LLM input resulted in higher precision rates, while recall rates largely remained stable. In dataset B, the precision of GPT-4o and Llama-3-70B improved from 0.83 to 0.95 and from 0.87 to 0.94, respectively. Overall classification performance with and without the annotation guideline was significantly different in five out of six conditions. CONCLUSION: GPT-4o and Llama-3.3-70B show promising performance in extracting imaging findings from stroke CT reports, although GPT-4o steadily outperformed Llama-3.3-70B. We also provide evidence that well-defined annotation guidelines can enhance LLM data extraction accuracy. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Annotation guidelines can improve the accuracy of LLMs in extracting findings from radiological reports, potentially optimizing data extraction for specific downstream applications. KEY POINTS: LLMs have utility in data extraction from radiology reports, but the role of annotation guidelines remains underexplored. Data extraction accuracy from stroke CT reports by GPT-4o and Llama-3.3-70B improved when well-defined annotation guidelines were incorporated into the model prompt. Well-defined annotation guidelines can improve the accuracy of LLMs in extracting imaging findings from radiological reports.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wihl et al. (2025) studied Stroke (n=300). Annotation guideline included in the prompt vs. Without annotation guideline was evaluated on Precision of extracting ten imaging findings from stroke CT reports. Incorporating annotation guidelines into LLM prompts improved data extraction precision from stroke CT reports, with GPT-4o precision increasing from 0.83 to 0.95 in a consecutive cohort.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: