PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 1, 1990Cardiovascular Research244 citations

Evidence for an intrinsic mechanism regulating heart rate variability in the transplanted and the intact heart during submaximal dynamic exercise?

View Full Paper
LBLuciano BernardiFSFernando SalvucciRSR. Suardi

Structured PICO

Does graded exercise alter heart rate variability and sympatho-vagal balance in normal subjects and heart transplant recipients?

P
Population
21 subjects, including 15 normal subjects (6 trained cyclists and 9 healthy sedentary subjects) and 6 orthotopic heart transplant recipients.
I
Intervention
Graded work load exercise on a cycle ergometer.
C
Comparator
Baseline (before exercise) and recovery (after exercise).
O
Outcome
Power spectrum of RR interval fluctuations (low frequency [LF] and high frequency [HF] components) and RR interval variance.surrogate

The study suggests that at peak exercise, a non-autonomic mechanism intrinsic to the heart muscle may determine heart rate fluctuations in synchrony with ventilation in both intact and denervated human hearts.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The aim was to assess the changes in sympatho-vagal balance which occur with exercise. DESIGN: The power spectrum of RR interval fluctuations (low frequency LF and high frequency components HF) was determined before, during, and after graded work load exercise on a cycle ergometer. The power spectrum of the respiratory signal, oxygen consumption, and respiratory volumes were also evaluated. In all subjects HF was considered to be an index of respiratory sinus arrhythmia. In normal subjects HF and LF were considered to be indices of relative vagal and sympathetic activity, respectively, whereas in heart transplant subjects HF was considered as a respiratory modulation of the intrinsic heart rate, and not dependent on autonomic tone. Heart rate variability was evaluated as RR interval variance. SUBJECTS: 15 normal subjects (six trained cyclists and nine healthy sedentary subjects) and six orthotopic heart transplant recipients took part in the study. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: During the first part of exercise, heart rate increased, RR interval variance decreased, HF decreased, and the relative amount of LF increased both in sedentary and athletic subjects, suggesting a relative increase in sympathetic tone. However, when approaching peak exercise, while heart rate further increased and the variance slightly decreased, the relative proportion of LF decreased and HF proportionally increased. At peak exercise HF accounted for 99.9% of heart rate variability in athletic subjects and for 88.9% in sedentary subjects (p less than 0.001 v baseline and v LF in both groups). In heart transplant subjects both the variance and the HF increased from the beginning of exercise (p less than 0.05), and showed a direct correlation with ventilatory variables and an inverse correlation with heart rate (r = 0.794, p less than 0.001, multiple regression analysis). No measurable LF components could be obtained in these subjects. During recovery, while the heart rate decreased and the RR interval variance increased, there was a relative increase in LF and a relative decrease in HF in normal subjects (either sedentary or athletic). Similarly, in heart transplant subjects, there was a decrease in HF during recovery. Thus the increase in HF at peak exercise in normal subjects contrasts with all the other data which suggest a prevalence in sympathetic tone during the entire exercise and the early recovery period, but appears similar to the increase in HF observed in heart transplant subjects due to the effect of increased ventilation during exercise. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that at peak exercise a non-autonomic mechanism, possibly intrinsic to the heart muscle, may determine heart rate fluctuations in synchrony with ventilation in the intact as well as in the denervated human heart.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bernardi et al. (1990) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1589fc5c7c86e0359f5370https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/24.12.969
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Determinants of heart rate variability in heart transplanted subjects during physical exercise1996 · 22 citations
  2. 2Sympathetic reinnervation and heart rate variability after cardiac transplantation.1997 · 24 citations
  3. 3Non-Respiratory Components of Heart Rate Variability in Heart Transplant Recipients: Evidence of Autonomic Reinnervation?1994 · 39 citations
  4. 4Clinical Relevance of Heart Rate Variability Changes after Heart Transplantation1996 · 9 citations
  5. 5Can power spectral analysis of heart rate variability identify a high risk subgroup of congestive heart failure patients with excessive sympathetic activation? A pilot study before and after heart transplantation.1994 · 139 citations