Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Gravitational waves from inspiraling, compact binaries will be searched for in the output of the LIGO-VIRGO interferometric network by the method of ``matched filtering''---i.e., by correlating the noisy output of each interferometer with a set of theoretical wave form templates. These search templates will be a discrete subset of a continuous, multiparameter family, each of which approximates a possible signal. The search might be performed hierarchically, with a first pass through the data using a low threshold and a coarsely spaced, few-parameter template set, followed by a second pass on threshold-exceeding data segments, with a higher threshold and a more finely spaced template set that might have a larger number of parameters. Alternatively, the search might involve a single pass through the data using the larger threshold and finer template set. This paper extends and generalizes the Sathyaprakash-Dhurandhar (SD) formalism for choosing the discrete, finely spaced template set used in the final (or sole) pass through the data, based on the analysis of a single interferometer. The SD formalism is rephrased in geometric language by introducing a metric on the continuous template space from which the discrete template set is drawn. This template metric is used to compute the loss of signal-to-noise ratio and reduction of event rate which result from the coarseness of the template grid. Correspondingly, the template spacing and total number N of templates are expressed, via the metric, as functions of the reduction in event rate. The theory is developed for a template family of arbitrary dimensionality (whereas the original SD formalism was restricted to a single nontrivial dimension). The theory is then applied to a simple post¹-Newtonian template family with two nontrivial dimensions. For this family, the number of templates N in the finely spaced grid is related to the spacing-induced fractional loss L of event rate and to the minimum mass Mₘᵢₙ of the least massive star in the binaries for which one searches by N{~}2×{}10⁵(0.1/L)(0.2M_/Mₘᵢₙ{)}2.7for the first LIGO interferometers and by N~8×{10}⁶$(0.1/L)(0.2${M}_{{{}}}$/${M}ₘᵢₙ)2.7 for advanced LIGO interferometers. This is several orders of magnitude greater than one might have expected based on Sathyaprakash's discovery of a near degeneracy in the parameter space, the discrepancy being due to that paper's high choice of Mₘᵢₙ and less stringent choice of L. The computational power P required to process the steady stream of incoming data from a single interferometer through the closely spaced set of templates is given in floating-point operations per second by P{~}3×{}10¹⁰(0.1/L)(0.2M_/Mₘᵢₙ{)}2.7for the first LIGO interferometers and by P~4×{10}¹¹$(0.1/L)(0.2${M}_{{{}}}$/${M}ₘᵢₙ)2.7 for advanced LIGO interferometers. This will be within the capabilities of LIGO-era computers, but a hierarchical search may still be desirable to reduce the required computing power. {} 1996 The American Physical Society.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
B. J. Owen (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: