This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
BACKGROUND: Although surgical resection is the standard of care for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer, frailty influences treatment decisions. We evaluated the prognostic utility of the Veterans Affairs Frailty Index, a claims-based assessment tool, among veterans undergoing resection for stage I non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of veterans who underwent curative-intent surgery for stage I non-small cell lung cancer in the Veterans Health Administration from 2006 to 2020. Using the Veterans Affairs Frailty Index, frailty was categorized as follows: nonfrail (≤0.1), prefrail (0.1-0.2), mildly frail (0.2-0.3), moderately frail (0.3-0.4), and severely frail (>0.4). The primary outcome was overall survival, assessed using multivariable Cox regression. Secondary outcomes included major complications, prolonged hospitalization, 30-day readmission, 90-day mortality, and recurrence. RESULTS: Among 12,271 veterans, 7.7% were severely frail. Compared with nonfrail patients, severely frail patients were older (mean age 70.3 years vs 64.7 years; P < .001) and were more likely to undergo minimally invasive surgery (57.7% vs 37.8%) and sublobar resection (41.2% vs 22.3%) (all P < .001). Severe frailty was independently associated with higher risk of major complications (adjusted odds ratio 2.85, 95% confidence interval 2.18-3.71), prolonged hospitalization (adjusted odds ratio 2.67), 30-day readmission (adjusted odds ratio 1.76), 90-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio 2.87), and worse overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio 2.20, 95% confidence interval 1.97-2.46; all P < .001). Recurrence was not significantly associated with frailty (adjusted hazard ratio 0.87; P = .410). CONCLUSION: Frailty, as measured by the Veterans Affairs Frailty Index, independently predicts adverse postoperative and survival outcomes following resection for stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Preoperative frailty assessment may improve risk stratification and guide surgical decision making.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seyoum et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: