Key result
Non-invasive ultrasound techniques have advanced the assessment of cerebrovascular diseases, though echo-contrast agents failed to show superiority over conventional techniques in the CEDAS trial.
Recent advancements in ultrasound techniques for cerebrovascular disease assessment require standardized data acquisition and interpretation, as established by recent consensus meetings.
Advances support standardized ultrasound protocols in practice; leaves open optimal techniques and contrast agent utility in cerebrovascular assessment.
Rapid progress in non-invasive ultrasound techniques has resulted in a wide variety of clinical applications for the assessment of cerebrovascular diseases. Recent highlights in ultrasound research include the evaluation of vascular ageing as a degenerative process, the demonstration of plaque development, motion and vulnerability in atherosclerosis and multi-dimensional as well as innovative imaging techniques (e.g., compound imaging) to depict early and small vascular lesions. In addition, echo-contrast agents have been used to compensate for difficulties in visualising late, severe or subtotal obstructive plaques, but failed to be really superior to conventional techniques as evidenced in a prospective, multi-centre trial (Contrast Enhanced Duplex sonography versus Arteriography Studies - CEDAS). With increasing sophistication of ultrasound methodology, it becomes essential to establish standards for data acquisition and interpretation: three consensus meetings have provided detailed recommendations on quantification of carotid atherosclerosis, characterisation of carotid artery plaques and detection of microembolism by transcranial Doppler as a potential indicator of stroke risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hennerici et al. (2003) conducted a review in Cerebrovascular diseases and atherosclerosis. Ultrasound techniques was evaluated. Non-invasive ultrasound techniques have advanced the assessment of cerebrovascular diseases, though echo-contrast agents failed to show superiority over conventional techniques in the CEDAS trial.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: