Key result
Chinese CRBS demonstrates acceptable reliability and validity in elderly Chinese patients.
Why the study?
This study aimed to translate and cross-culturally adapt the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale to Chinese and assess its reliability and validity among older individuals.
Cross-Sectional (n=325)
Yes
The Chinese version of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale demonstrates acceptable reliability and validity for assessing barriers to cardiac rehabilitation in the Chinese elderly population.
May support barrier assessment in Chinese elderly; extends CRBS validation but leaves clinical adoption open.
Purpose: This study aimed to translate and cross-culturally adapt the cardiac rehabilitation barriers scale to the Chinese, and examine its reliability and validity among the older population. Methods: An approach comprising translation, cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity examination in the Chinese version was conducted in two hospitals in Jilin, China. The t -tests were used to compare the sex differences between each item. Participants included Chinese individuals > 60 who were eligible for the cardiac rehabilitation program. Results: In total, 325 participants completed the questionnaire with an average age of 61.23 ± 9.68 years. The item-total correlations were 0.432 to 0.678. Factor analysis of CRBS-C (Kaiser Meyer Olkin = 0.867, Bartlett’s test p = 0.000) revealed four factors: logistical factors, comorbidities/functional status, perceived need/healthcare factors, and work/time conflict. The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicated a good model fit (χ 2/df = 1.84, RMSEA = 0.051, CFI = 0.953, TLI = 0.945, SRMR=0.046). Cronbach’s alpha was 0.88 for the scale, ranging from 0.801 to 0.88 for each item, which indicates the internal reliability was acceptable. Conclusion: The Chinese version of the CRRS has acceptable reliability and validity in the Chinese elderly population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2024) conducted a cross-sectional in Eligible for cardiac rehabilitation program (n=325). Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale (CRBS-C) was evaluated on Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the CRBS. The Chinese version of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale demonstrated acceptable reliability (Cronbach's alpha 0.88) and validity (CFA CFI = 0.953) among the Chinese elderly population.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: