Why the study?
Rural cardiac patients typically have less access to secondary prevention resources and quality of life services, so the study examined how they access health care and cardiac rehabilitation after myocardial infarction.
Rural post-MI patients experience significant uncertainty when seeking healthcare and cardiac rehabilitation, highlighting the need for improved information and support following discharge.
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Secondary prevention strategies reduce disease progression to heart failure. Rural cardiac patients typically have less access to health care resources to support them in managing secondary prevention, and services to improve quality of life tend to be lacking in rural settings. The study aim was to examine the process that rural cardiac patients go through to access health care and cardiac rehabilitation (CR) following myocardial infarction (MI). In-depth interviews with 11 post-MI participants using Straussian grounded theory were undertaken. Analysis revealed a linear process from hospital discharge to maintaining health. There were five elements: comfort with health information, relationship with health care providers, social support, taking ownership, and availability of/for CR. The core category was "being uncertain." Findings can be used to identify ways to improve access and address uncertainty stemming from a lack of perceived information and supports following discharge.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lowe et al. (2021) studied Myocardial infarction (n=11).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: