Key result
Self-efficacy and good mental health predict older adult exercise adherence, while depression and distance hinder it.
Why the study?
Prescribed exercise helps prevent adverse health outcomes in older adults, but adherence may be low, prompting an evaluation of predictors of adherence.
What are the predictors of adherence to prescribed exercise programs in older adults with medical or surgical indications?
Systematic Review (n=5,785)
What are the predictors of adherence to prescribed exercise programs in older adults with medical or surgical indications?
Depression and distance from the facility negatively predict exercise adherence in older adults, while self-efficacy and good mental health positively predict it, highlighting targets for improving participation.
Clinicians should address depression and access barriers in exercise prescriptions for older adults; extends evidence on modifiable adherence predictors for intervention trials.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Prescribed exercise to treat medical conditions and to prepare for surgery is a promising intervention to prevent adverse health outcomes for older adults; however, adherence to exercise programs may be low. Our objective was to identify and grade the quality of predictors of adherence to prescribed exercise in older adults. METHODS: Prospective experimental studies were identified using a peer-reviewed search strategy applied to MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane and CINAHL from inception until October 6, 2020. Following independent and duplicate review of titles, abstracts and full texts, we included prospective studies with an average population age > 65 years, where exercise was formally prescribed for a medical or surgical condition. We excluded studies where exercise was prescribed for a chronic musculoskeletal condition. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality in Prognostic studies tool or Cochrane risk of bias tool, as appropriate. Predictors of adherence were identified, pooled, and graded for quality using an adaptation of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework for predictor studies. RESULTS: We included 19 observational studies and 4 randomized controlled trials (n=5785) Indications for exercise included cardiac (n=6), pulmonary rehabilitation (n=7), or other (n=10; surgical, medical, and neurologic). Of the 10 studies that reported adherence as the percent of prescribed sessions completed, average adherence was 80% (range 60%-98%; standard deviation (SD) 11%). Of the 10 studies that reported adherence as a categorical threshold demarking adherent vs not adherent, average adherence was 57.5% (range 21%-83%; SD 21%). Moderate-quality evidence suggested that positive predictors of adherence were self-efficacy and good self-rated mental health; negative predictors were depression (high quality) and distance from the exercise facility. Moderate-quality evidence suggested that comorbidity and age were not predictive of adherence. CONCLUSIONS: These findings can inform design of future exercise programs as well as identification of individuals who may require extra support to benefit from prescribed exercise. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018108242
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shaw et al. (2020) conducted a systematic review in Medical or surgical indications for exercise (n=5,785). Prescribed exercise programs was evaluated on Predictors of adherence to prescribed exercise. Higher self-efficacy and good self-rated mental health positively predicted exercise adherence in older adults, whereas depression and distance from the exercise facility were negative predictors.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: