This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
We investigate two models of a quantum system under rapid measurement performed to detect whether the system is in a given state |ψd. In the first, the detection process is modeled via an imaginary potential 2i|ψdψd|/τ. In the second approach, repeated strong projective measurements are performed on the otherwise unitarily evolving system with a fixed high frequency 1/τ. We compare the statistics of the random time T of first successful detection for the two models, considering both its probability density function $F(t)$ and the moments Tᵐ. We show, by a direct comparison of the two solutions, that both approaches yield the same results for $F(t)$ (and so the moments) in the small-τ limit, also called the Zeno limit, as long as the initial state |ψᵢₙ is not parallel to the detection state, so that |ψd|ψᵢₙ|<1. When this condition is violated, however, the low probability density to detect the state on timescales much larger than τ is precisely a factor of 4 smaller in the non-Hermitian model. We express the solution of the Zeno limit of both problems formally in terms of an electrostatic analogy. Our results are corroborated by numerical simulations.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thiel et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: