Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article examines and interprets the linguistic behaviour of `individuals' and `people' in the official literature of lifelong learning, in the light of theories of individualization in late modern culture and society, particularly those of Beck and Giddens. Using a 950,000-word corpus of recent government and academic publications on lifelong learning, it presents a concordance-based analysis of `individuals' as members of institutionalized collectivities, as agents, as rational citizens, and as consumers. It compares `individuals' with `people' and, for reference, presents a comparison with both words as they occur in the British National Corpus. The study concludes that close analysis of a corpus can provide valuable evidence for the constituent potential of language in theories of society and culture, and that the differences between `individuals' and `people' demonstrate that the discourse of lifelong learning has close affinities with contemporary sociocultural models of individualization, consumption and production, and with the risk society.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alison Piper (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: