Key result
Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine demonstrate preclinical proarrhythmia risk via IKr inhibition, not worsened by macrolides.
Why the study?
To assess the risk of chloroquine- or hydroxychloroquine-mediated QT prolongation and Torsades de Pointes, alone and combined with erythromycin and azithromycin repurposed during COVID-19.
Does chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine, alone or combined with macrolides, increase proarrhythmia risk in in vitro and in silico models?
Does chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine, alone or combined with macrolides, increase proarrhythmia risk in in vitro and in silico models?
In vitro and in silico models confirm that chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine carry a proarrhythmic risk at therapeutic concentrations, which is not worsened by the addition of macrolides.
We applied a set of in silico and in vitro assays, compliant with the Comprehensive In Vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA) paradigm, to assess the risk of chloroquine (CLQ) or hydroxychloroquine (OH‐CLQ)‐mediated QT prolongation and Torsades de Pointes (TdP), alone and combined with erythromycin (ERT) and azithromycin (AZI), drugs repurposed during the first wave of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19). Each drug or drug combination was tested in patch clamp assays on seven cardiac ion channels, in in silico models of human ventricular electrophysiology (Virtual Assay) using control (healthy) or high‐risk cell populations, and in human‐induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)‐derived cardiomyocytes. In each assay, concentration‐response curves encompassing and exceeding therapeutic free plasma levels were generated. Both CLQ and OH‐CLQ showed blocking activity against some potassium, sodium, and calcium currents. CLQ and OH‐CLQ inhibited I Kr (half‐maximal inhibitory concentration [IC 50 ]: 1 µM and 3–7 µM, respectively) and I K1 currents (IC 50 : 5 and 44 µM, respectively). When combining OH‐CLQ with AZI, no synergistic effects were observed. The two macrolides had no or very weak effects on the ion currents (IC 50 > 300–1000 µM). Using Virtual Assay, both antimalarials affected several TdP indicators, CLQ being more potent than OH‐CLQ. Effects were more pronounced in the high‐risk cell population. In hiPSC‐derived cardiomyocytes, all drugs showed early after‐depolarizations, except AZI. Combining CLQ or OH‐CLQ with a macrolide did not aggravate their effects. In conclusion, our integrated nonclinical CiPA dataset confirmed that, at therapeutic plasma concentrations relevant for malaria or off‐label use in COVID‐19, CLQ and OH‐CLQ use is associated with a proarrhythmia risk, which is higher in populations carrying predisposing factors but not worsened with macrolide combination.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Delaunois et al. (2021) studied COVID-19 / Malaria. Chloroquine (CLQ) or hydroxychloroquine (OH-CLQ) alone and combined with erythromycin (ERT) and azithromycin (AZI) was evaluated on QT prolongation and Torsades de Pointes (TdP) risk (ion channel blocking activity, TdP indicators, early after-depolarizations). Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine inhibited IKr currents (IC50 1 µM and 3-7 µM) and demonstrated proarrhythmia risk in in vitro and in silico models, which was not worsened by macrolides.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: