Key result
Novel educational framework addresses high nursing workload and poor patient comprehension via tutors and multimedia.
Why the study?
Controlling CVD is heavily influenced by behavior and lifestyle, requiring effective training systems to teach self-care skills to patients and caregivers.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A structured framework using multi-criteria decision-making can effectively identify and prioritize systemic and patient-level barriers to cardiovascular health education.
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are always considered by healthcare specialists for different reasons, including extensive prevalence, increased costs, chronicity, and high risk of death. The control of CVDs is highly influenced by behavior and lifestyle and it seems necessary to train special abilities about lifestyle and behavior modification to improve self-care skills for patients, and their caregivers. As a result, the development of effective training systems should be considered by healthcare specialists. METHODS: Hence, in this study, a framework for improving cardiovascular patients' education processes is presented. Initially, an existing training system for cardiovascular patients is reviewed. Using field observations and targeted interviews with hospital experts, all components of its educating processes are identified, and their process maps are drawn up. After that, challenges in the training system are extracted with the aid of in-depth semi-structured interviews with experts. Due to the importance and different influence of the identified challenges, they are prioritized using a Multiple Criteria Decision-making (MCDM) method, and then their root causes were investigated. Finally, a novel framework is proposed and evaluated with hospital experts' help to improve the main challenges. RESULTS: The most important challenges included high nursing workload and shortage of time, lack of understanding of training concepts by patients, lack of attention to training, disruption of the training processes by the patients' caregivers, and patient's weakness in understanding the standard language. In identifying the root causes, learner, educator, and educational tools are the most effective in the training process; therefore, the improvement scenarios were designed accordingly in the proposed framework. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicated that presenting a framework with applying different quantitative and qualitative methods has great potential to improve the processes of patient education for chronic diseases such as cardiovascular disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saboktakin et al. (2021) studied Cardiovascular diseases (n=44). Novel patient education framework (including tutors, interactive apps, and peer education) vs. Current education process was evaluated on Prioritization of patient education challenges using the PROMETHEE II method. A novel educational framework incorporating dedicated tutors, interactive multimedia tools, and peer education was developed to address the primary challenges of high nursing workload and poor patient comprehension.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: