Key result
Catheter ablation targeting focal sources improved 1-year freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias compared to conventional stepwise ablation (57% vs 38%; HR 1.85; 95% CI 1.17-2.96; P=0.009).
Why the study?
Does catheter ablation targeting focal sources improve freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia compared to conventional stepwise ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=136)
Does catheter ablation targeting focal sources improve freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia compared to conventional stepwise ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
Effect estimate: HR 1.85 (95% CI 1.17-2.96)
Absolute Event Rate: 57% vs 38%
p-value: p=0.009
Targeting focal sources during catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation significantly improves 1-year freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias compared to conventional stepwise ablation.
Focal source ablation was associated with higher arrhythmia freedom in this cohort; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
INTRODUCTION: Recent studies suggest that atrial fibrillation (AF) is maintained by electrical activity arising from focal sources. We sought to test whether catheter ablation that targets focal sources can improve on current ablation protocols for persistent AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: 3 navigation. If a site demonstrated centrifugal activation over at least three consecutive cycles, it was deemed a focal source and ablated. If AF remained, defragmentation was performed until AF was terminated. Freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia was compared between the study patients and propensity score matched historical controls who had undergone conventional stepwise ablation. Of the 68 study patients, 2.9 ± 1.9 focal sources were identified in 60 patients. Focal sources displayed transient centrifugal activation patterns for a median of six consecutive cycles. Total radiofrequency duration was shorter in the study group (62 ± 16 minutes vs. 75 ± 24 minutes, P = 0.0003). During a 1-year follow-up period, 39 (57%) and 26 (38%) patients were free from atrial tachyarrhythmias in the absence of antiarrhythmic drugs in the study and control groups, respectively (hazard ratio: 1.85, 95% confidence interval: 1.17-2.96, P = 0.009). Improvement of clinical outcome was mainly driven by a decrease in recurrence of atrial tachycardia in the study patients (22% vs. 40%, P = 0.047). CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that focal sources are appropriate ablation targets in addition to the PVs in persistent AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takahashi et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Persistent atrial fibrillation (n=136). Catheter ablation targeting focal sources vs. Conventional stepwise ablation (propensity score matched historical controls) was evaluated on Freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias in the absence of antiarrhythmic drugs (HR 1.85, 95% CI 1.17-2.96, p=0.009). Catheter ablation targeting focal sources improved 1-year freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias compared to conventional stepwise ablation (57% vs 38%; HR 1.85; 95% CI 1.17-2.96; P=0.009).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: