PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2009EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing70 citationsOpen Access

Procedural Modeling for Digital Cultural Heritage

View Full Paper
SHSimon HaeglerPMPascal MüllerLGLuc Van Gool

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The rapid development of computer graphics and imaging provides the modern archeologist with several tools to realistically model and visualize archeological sites in 3D. This, however, creates a tension between veridical and realistic modeling. Visually compelling models may lead people to falsely believe that there exists very precise knowledge about the past appearance of a site. In order to make the underlying uncertainty visible, it has been proposed to encode this uncertainty with different levels of transparency in the rendering, or of decoloration of the textures. We argue that procedural modeling technology based on shape grammars provides an interesting alternative to such measures, as they tend to spoil the experience for the observer. Both its efficiency and compactness make procedural modeling a tool to produce multiple models, which together sample the space of possibilities. Variations between the different models express levels of uncertainty implicitly, while letting each individual model keeping its realistic appearance. The underlying, structural description makes the uncertainty explicit. Additionally, procedural modeling also yields the flexibility to incorporate changes as knowledge of an archeological site gets refined. Annotations explaining modeling decisions can be included. We demonstrate our procedural modeling implementation with several recent examples.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Haegler et al. (2009) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a15a1a5b2e0231f1582c743https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/852392
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper