Key result
RV mid-septal pacing preserves LV contractility and synchrony as effectively as LV apical epicardial pacing.
Why the study?
Permanent pacing in children with isolated congenital complete atrioventricular block may cause left ventricular dysfunction, but alternative pacing sites like left ventricular epicardial or selective right ventricular endocardial pacing have not been directly compared for functional outcomes.
Does 3D mapping-guided right ventricular mid-septal pacing compared to left ventricular apical epicardial pacing preserve left ventricular contractility and synchrony in pediatric patients with congenital complete atrioventricular block?
Cohort (n=36)
Does 3D mapping-guided right ventricular mid-septal pacing compared to left ventricular apical epicardial pacing preserve left ventricular contractility and synchrony in pediatric patients with congenital complete atrioventricular block?
Both left ventricular apical epicardial pacing and 3D mapping-guided right ventricular mid-septal pacing preserve left ventricular contractility and synchrony in children with congenital complete AV block at short- to mid-term follow-up.
Both approaches support preserved LV function in pediatric congenital AV block; hypothesis-generating and leaves optimal site open for randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: Permanent pacing in children with isolated congenital complete atrioventricular block may cause left ventricular dysfunction. To prevent it, alternative pacing sites have been proposed: left ventricular epicardial or selective right ventricular endocardial pacing. AIMS: To compare the functional outcome (left ventricular systolic function and synchrony) in paediatric patients with congenital complete atrioventricular block and left ventricular apical epicardial or right ventricular transvenous mid-septal pacing. METHODS: Retrospective study. Epicardial leads were implanted by standard surgical technique, transvenous leads by 3D electroanatomic mapping systems. 3D mapping acquired 3D right ventricular local pacing map and defined the narrowest paced QRS site. 3D mapping guided screw-in bipolar leads on that ventricular site. Electrocardiogram (ECG) (QRS duration) and echocardiographic data (synchrony: interventricular mechanical delay, septal to posterior wall motion delay, systolic dyssynchrony index; contractility: global longitudinal strain, ejection fraction) were recorded. Data are reported as median [interquartile ranges]. p < 0.05 was significant. RESULTS: There were 19 transvenous systems (age 8.8 [6-14] years; right ventricular mid-septum) and 17 epicardial systems (0.04 [0.001-0.6] years; left ventricular apex). Post-implantation QRS significantly widened either in endocardial or in epicardial patients. Most patients reached 4-year follow-up. One-year and 4-year ejection fraction and global longitudinal strain were mostly within normal limits and did not show significant differences between the two groups and between the same endocardial/epicardial group. Synchrony parameters were within normal limits in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Left ventricular apical epicardial pacing and 3D mapping-guided right ventricular mid-septal pacing preserved left ventricular contractility and synchrony in children and adolescents with congenital complete atrioventricular block at short-/mid-term follow-up, without relevant significant differences between the two groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Silvetti et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Congenital complete atrioventricular block (n=36). Right ventricular transvenous mid-septal pacing vs. Left ventricular apical epicardial pacing was evaluated on Left ventricular systolic function and synchrony. Right ventricular mid-septal pacing (n=19) and left ventricular apical epicardial pacing (n=17) preserved LV contractility and synchrony at 4-year follow-up without significant differences.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: