Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized trial demonstrates pharmacokinetic dose calculation achieves superior target plasma drug levels in patients, indicating personalized modeling outperforms standard clinical intuition.
A prospective randomised trial was conducted to compare aminoglycoside dose prediction based on individually measured pharmacokinetic data, with dosage based on physician intuition. 2. After 2 days of therapy more patients in the pharmacokinetic group had achieved both peak (6-10 mg 1(-1] and trough (1-2 mg 1(-1] target plasma concentrations (P = 0.007), peaks alone (P = 0.01) and troughs alone (P = 0.01). Their mean (s.e. mean) peak concentration was 6.49 +/- 0.39 mg 1(-1) compared with 4.27 +/- 0.52 mg 1(-1) in the control group (P = 0.001), with trough concentrations of 1.44 +/- 0.22 mg 1(-1) and 0.94 +/- 0.21 mg 1(-1) respectively (P = 0.054). 3. After 5 days of therapy, peak and trough concentrations were still significantly higher in the pharmacokinetic group despite empirical dose adjustment (P = 0.01 and P = 0.013 respectively). 4. The mean (s.e. mean) daily dose of aminoglycoside was higher in the computer group (312 +/- 17 mg vs 203 +/- 13 mg, P = 0.001). 5. These findings suggest that dose estimation based on measured pharmacokinetic parameters is superior at achieving target plasma drug concentrations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Begg et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: