Key result
Machine learning predicts postsurgical LOS and discharge disposition with an AUC up to 0.88.
Why the study?
Surgeries are scheduled largely based on operating room resource availability with little attention to downstream resource availability, but predicting postsurgical length of stay and discharge disposition at case posting could support resource allocation.
Can machine learning models accurately predict postsurgical length of stay and discharge disposition at the time of case posting?
Cohort (n=63,574)
Can machine learning models accurately predict postsurgical length of stay and discharge disposition at the time of case posting?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.81 (LOS), 0.88 (DD)
p-value: p=0.001
Machine learning models using data available at case posting can accurately predict postsurgical length of stay and discharge disposition, potentially aiding resource allocation and discharge planning.
Objective: Develop machine learning (ML) models to predict postsurgical length of stay (LOS) and discharge disposition (DD) for multiple services with only the data available at the time of case posting. Background: Surgeries are scheduled largely based on operating room resource availability with little attention to downstream resource availability such as inpatient bed availability and the care needs after hospitalization. Predicting postsurgical LOS and DD at the time of case posting could support resource allocation and earlier discharge planning. Methods: This retrospective study included 63,574 adult patients undergoing elective inpatient surgery at a large academic health system. We used surgical case data available at the time of case posting and created gradient-boosting decision tree classification models to predict LOS as short (≤1 day), medium (2–4 days), and prolonged stays (≥5 days) and DD as home versus nonhome. Results: The LOS model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.81. Adding relative value unit and historical LOS through the similarity cascade increased the accuracy of short and prolonged LOS prediction by 9.0% and 3.9% to 72.9% and 74%, respectively, compared with a model without these features ( P = 0.001). The DD model had an AUC of 0.88 for home versus nonhome prediction. Conclusions: We developed ML models to predict, at the time of case posting, the postsurgical LOS and DD for adult elective inpatient cases across multiple services. These models could support case scheduling, resource allocation, optimal bed utilization, earlier discharge planning, and preventing case cancelation due to bed unavailability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zaribafzadeh et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Elective inpatient surgery (n=63,574). Machine learning models (gradient-boosting decision tree) was evaluated on Postsurgical length of stay (LOS) and discharge disposition (DD) (AUC 0.81 (LOS), 0.88 (DD), p=0.001). Machine learning models using data available at case posting predicted postsurgical length of stay with an AUC of 0.81 and discharge disposition with an AUC of 0.88.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: