Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose This article aims to present and compare research perspectives and theoretical reflections from a variety of academic fields on the concept of added value of facilities management. Design/methodology/approach The starting point is the so‐called FM Value Map, which was presented in a recent article in Facilities by Per Anker Jensen in 2010. The article is a first result of the work in the EuroFM research collaboration group and is based on literature reviews of the most influential journals within the academic fields of facilities management (FM), corporate real estate management and business‐to‐business marketing. Findings Good relationship management and building on trust is shown to be equally important as delivering the agreed services. Originality/value Usually the concept of added value is discussed from a monodisciplinary point‐of‐view. The different backgrounds of the authors add value to an increased understanding of the added value of FM by comparing and testing different ways of conceptualising this issue. This is of great importance to FM research and evidence‐based FM as a sound basis for the long‐term recognition of FM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jensen et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: