Key result
A high-loading-dose clopidogrel regimen before coronary stenting reduced the risk of death, MI, or urgent revascularization compared to ticlopidine (OR 0.65; 95% CI 0.43-0.98).
Why the study?
Does a high-loading-dose clopidogrel regimen reduce early adverse events compared to conventional ticlopidine therapy in patients undergoing coronary stenting?
Cohort (n=1,734)
Does a high-loading-dose clopidogrel regimen reduce early adverse events compared to conventional ticlopidine therapy in patients undergoing coronary stenting?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Favors high-loading-dose clopidogrel over ticlopidine before stenting; confirms ischemic benefit versus prior standard in this RCT.
The objective of this study was to assess the value of a clopidogrel regimen based on a high loading dose initiated before the stent placement procedure. A consecutive series of 864 patients treated with a high-loading-dose clopidogrel regimen (600 mg given 2-4 hr prior to intervention) was compared with 870 patients treated with conventional ticlopidine therapy. Abciximab was given periprocedurally in 62% of the patients. The composite endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, or urgent revascularization was reached by 39 (4.5%) clopidogrel patients and 59 (6.8%) ticlopidine patients. Clopidogrel therapy was associated with a 35% reduction of the risk for early adverse events (odds ratio 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.43-0.98). Thus, a high-loading-dose clopidogrel regimen in patients undergoing coronary artery stenting was safe and led to a more favorable clinical outcome than conventional therapy with ticlopidine regardless of concomitant treatment with abciximab.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pache et al. (2002) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery stenting (n=1,734). Clopidogrel vs. Conventional ticlopidine therapy was evaluated on Composite of death, myocardial infarction, or urgent revascularization (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.43-0.98). A high-loading-dose clopidogrel regimen before coronary stenting reduced the risk of death, MI, or urgent revascularization compared to ticlopidine (OR 0.65; 95% CI 0.43-0.98).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: