Why the study?
Does combination therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin prevent subacute stent thrombosis and death in patients following coronary stent implantation?
Does combination therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin prevent subacute stent thrombosis and death in patients following coronary stent implantation?
Combination therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin is a safe and effective alternative to ticlopidine for preventing subacute thrombosis after coronary stenting.
Low event rates support clopidogrel-aspirin post-stenting in this cohort; leaves open randomized comparison versus ticlopidine.
Combination antiplatelet therapy using aspirin and ticlopidine has been the standard of care for prevention of subacute thrombosis following coronary stent implantation. However, the use of ticlopidine is associated with a significant risk of adverse hematologic side effects. Clopidogrel is an inhibitor of ADP-induced platelet aggregation that has a better safety profile than ticlopidine. We examined the 30-day clinical outcome following coronary stent implantation in 253 consecutive patients treated with clopidogrel and aspirin. Follow-up was achieved in 99% of patients and four adverse events were documented. Two patients had angiographically confirmed subacute stent thrombosis (0.8%), and both of these patients underwent successful repeat angioplasty at the stent site. There were two patient deaths during follow-up (0. 8%). One was sudden within 1 week of stent placement and the other occurred in a patient with multisystem organ failure after an extensive myocardial infarction that antedated the stent procedure, with no clinical evidence for stent thrombosis. The combined frequency of subacute stent thrombosis and death was 1.6%. This is comparable to prior studies using the combination of ticlopidine and aspirin following stenting. Therefore, clopidogrel in combination with aspirin appears to be a safe and effective therapy in the prevention of subacute thrombosis following coronary stent implantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kolansky et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: