PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 11, 1999Circulation352 citations

Effectiveness of Clopidogrel and Aspirin Versus Ticlopidine and Aspirin in Preventing Stent Thrombosis After Coronary Stent Implantation

View Full Paper
IMIssam MoussaMOMathew OetgenGRGary S. Roubin

Key Result

Clopidogrel and aspirin resulted in similar rates of stent thrombosis compared to ticlopidine and aspirin (1.4% vs 1.5%, P=1.0) but significantly lower rates of side effects (5.3% vs 10.6%).

Key Points

  • The study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of clopidogrel and aspirin versus ticlopidine and aspirin after coronary stent implantation.
  • Compared two groups: 1406 patients on ticlopidine and aspirin and 283 patients on clopidogrel and aspirin.
  • Follow-up conducted at one month post-coronary stenting.
  • Analyzed stent thrombosis rates and adverse events.
  • No significant difference in stent thrombosis rates: 1.5% (TA group) vs 1.4% (CA group), P=1.0.
  • No significant difference in major adverse cardiac events: 3.1% (TA group) vs 2.4% (CA group), P=0.85.
  • Higher incidence of adverse effects in TA group: 10.6% vs 5.3% in CA group, P=0.006; RR 0.53, CI 0.32 to 0.86.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=1,689)

Structured PICO

Does clopidogrel and aspirin prevent stent thrombosis and reduce side effects compared to ticlopidine and aspirin in patients undergoing coronary stent implantation?

P
Population
1,689 patients who underwent coronary stenting treated with either clopidogrel and aspirin or ticlopidine and aspirin, followed for 1 month.
E
Exposure
Clopidogrel and aspirin
C
Comparator
Ticlopidine and aspirin
O
Outcome
Stent thrombosis at 1-month follow-uphard clinical

Clopidogrel plus aspirin provides similar efficacy to ticlopidine plus aspirin for preventing stent thrombosis after coronary stenting, but with a significantly better safety profile.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 1.4% vs 1.5%

p-value: p=1.0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ticlopidine has been shown to reduce the incidence of stent thrombosis compared with warfarin, but it may cause serious hematological side effects. Clopidogrel, a new thienopyridine derivative, may be a safe alternative to ticlopidine. The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of clopidogrel and aspirin with those of ticlopidine and aspirin in patients undergoing coronary stent implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: The population of this study consisted of 2 groups: patients who underwent coronary stenting and were treated with ticlopidine and aspirin (TA group, n=1406), and patients who underwent coronary stenting followed by treatment with clopidogrel and aspirin (CA group, n=283). At 1-month follow-up, there was no difference in stent thrombosis (1.5% versus 1.4%, P=1.0) or major adverse cardiac events (3.1% versus 2.4%, P=0. 85) between the TA and CA groups, respectively. The probability of any side effect (neutropenia, diarrhea, rash) was significantly higher in the TA group (10.6% versus 5.3%, P=0.006; relative risk, 0. 53; CI, 0.32 to 0.86). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that clopidogrel may be an effective pharmacological regimen after coronary stent implantation. Furthermore, the simpler dosing regimen, the absence of neutropenia, and the lower frequency of other side effects make it a safe alternative to ticlopidine.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Moussa et al. (1999) conducted a cohort in coronary stent implantation (n=1,689). Clopidogrel and aspirin vs. Ticlopidine and aspirin was evaluated on stent thrombosis (p=1.0). Clopidogrel and aspirin resulted in similar rates of stent thrombosis compared to ticlopidine and aspirin (1.4% vs 1.5%, P=1.0) but significantly lower rates of side effects (5.3% vs 10.6%).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a6a318202245592faf19c2ehttps://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.99.18.2364
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper