Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The purpose of this paper is to review the use and interpretation of the Friedman two-way analysis of variance by ranks test for ordinal-level data in repeated measurement designs. Physical therapists frequently make three or more repeated measurements of the same individual to compare different treatments, or to assess the effect of a single treatment over time. When the measurements are ordinal-scaled, such as some ratings of functional status and muscle strength, statistical significance may be determined by the Friedman test. We illustrate the use of the Friedman test and a post hoc multiple comparison test with data from 27 subjects whose performance on a lifting task was rated on three occasions by use of an ordinal scale. We discuss the interpretation of ordinal-level data and recommend that therapists understand the limitations a measurement scale imposes on the inferences that can be made from these tests.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sheldon et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: