This article reviews four commonly used approaches to group modeling in fMRI. The methods differ in their computational intensity (FSL with its two-level estimation including MCM being the most intense) and assumptions (SPM2 with its assumption of spatially homogeneous covariance V/sub g/ being most restrictive). This study also distinguishes fixed-effects models from mixed-effects models and motivates the importance of a mixed-effects model for group fMRI analysis. The sections following that describe single-subject modeling and show a general method for estimating the group model.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mumford et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: