This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
MOTIVATION: With the proliferation of microarray experiments and their availability in the public domain, the use of meta-analysis methods to combine results from different studies increases. In microarray experiments, where the sample size is often limited, meta-analysis offers the possibility to considerably increase the statistical power and give more accurate results. RESULTS: A moderated effect size combination method was proposed and compared with other meta-analysis approaches. All methods were applied to real publicly available datasets on prostate cancer, and were compared in an extensive simulation study for various amounts of inter-study variability. Although the proposed moderated effect size combination improved already existing effect size approaches, the P-value combination was found to provide a better sensitivity and a better gene ranking than the other meta-analysis methods, while effect size methods were more conservative. AVAILABILITY: An R package metaMA is available on the CRAN.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marot et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: