Key result
Prone position during free-breathing 3D coronary MRA improved signal-to-noise ratio compared to the supine position (15.5 vs 11.4; P<0.01) and reduced diaphragmatic drift.
Why the study?
Does image acquisition in the prone position improve image quality and reduce diaphragmatic drift compared to the supine position during free-breathing 3D coronary MRA in patients with CAD and healthy volunteers?
Observational (n=18)
Does image acquisition in the prone position improve image quality and reduce diaphragmatic drift compared to the supine position during free-breathing 3D coronary MRA in patients with CAD and healthy volunteers?
Prone positioning during free-breathing 3D coronary MRA significantly improves image quality (SNR and CNR) and reduces diaphragmatic drift compared to supine positioning.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support prone positioning for higher-quality coronary MRA; leaves open impact on diagnostic accuracy in CAD.
Navigator-gated and corrected 3D coronary MR angiography (MRA) allows submillimeter image acquisition during free breathing. However, cranial diaphragmatic drift and relative phase shifts of chest-wall motion are limiting factors for image quality and scanning duration. We hypothesized that image acquisition in the prone position would minimize artifacts related to chest-wall motion and suppress diaphragmatic drift. Twelve patients with radiographically-confirmed coronary artery disease and six healthy adult volunteers were studied in both the prone and the supine position during free-breathing navigator-gated and corrected 3D coronary MRA. Image quality and the diaphragmatic positions were objectively compared. In the prone position, there was a 36% improvement in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR; 15.5 +/- 2.7 vs. 11.4 +/- 2.6; P < 0.01) and a 34% improvement in CNR (12.5 +/- 3.3 vs. 9.3 +/- 2.5, P < 0.01). The prone position also resulted in a 17% improvement in coronary vessel definition (P < 0.01). Cranial end-expiratory diaphragmatic drift occurred less frequently in the prone position (23% +/- 17% vs. 40% +/- 26% supine; P <0.05), and navigator efficiency was higher. Prone coronary MRA results in improved SNR and CNR with enhanced coronary vessel definition. Cranial end-expiratory diaphragmatic drift also was reduced, and navigator efficiency was enhanced. When feasible, prone imaging is recommended for free-breathing coronary MRA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stuber et al. (2001) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease (n=18). Prone position during 3D coronary MRA vs. Supine position was evaluated on Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) (p=< 0.01). Prone position during free-breathing 3D coronary MRA improved signal-to-noise ratio compared to the supine position (15.5 vs 11.4; P<0.01) and reduced diaphragmatic drift.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: