Key result
Unipolar mapping with far-field cancellation outperforms bipolar mapping in detecting low-voltage regions during AF.
Why the study?
Identifying low-voltage, myopathic regions during AF using traditional bipolar voltage mapping is limited by the directional dependency of wave propagation.
Does unipolar voltage mapping with far-field cancellation improve the detection of abnormal atrial substrate during atrial fibrillation compared to bipolar mapping?
Observational (n=12)
Does unipolar voltage mapping with far-field cancellation improve the detection of abnormal atrial substrate during atrial fibrillation compared to bipolar mapping?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.8% vs 0.77%
p-value: p=<.05
Unipolar voltage mapping with far-field cancellation improves the accuracy of detecting low-voltage atrial substrate during atrial fibrillation compared to traditional bipolar mapping.
May enhance low-voltage detection during AF; hypothesis-generating for substrate-guided ablation pending validation.
INTRODUCTION: An important substrate for atrial fibrillation (AF) is fibrotic atrial myopathy. Identifying low voltage, myopathic regions during AF using traditional bipolar voltage mapping is limited by the directional dependency of wave propagation. Our objective was to evaluate directionally independent unipolar voltage mapping, but with far-field cancellation, to identify low-voltage regions during AF. METHODS: In 12 patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation for AF, high-resolution voltage mapping was performed in the left atrium during sinus rhythm and AF using a roving 20-pole circular catheter. Bipolar electrograms (EGMs) (Bi) < 0.5 mV in sinus rhythm identified low-voltage regions. During AF, bipolar voltage and unipolar voltage maps were created, the latter with (uni-res) and without (uni-orig) far-field cancellation using a novel, validated least-squares algorithm. RESULTS: Uni-res voltage was ~25% lower than uni-orig for both low voltage and normal atrial regions. Far-field EGM had a dominant frequency (DF) of 4.5-6.0 Hz, and its removal resulted in a lower DF for uni-orig compared with uni-res (5.1 ± 1.5 vs. 4.8 ± 1.5 Hz; p < .001). Compared with Bi, uni-res had a significantly greater area under the receiver operator curve (0.80 vs. 0.77; p < .05), specificity (86% vs. 76%; p < .001), and positive predictive value (43% vs. 30%; p < .001) for detecting low-voltage during AF. Similar improvements in specificity and positive predictive value were evident for uni-res versus uni-orig. CONCLUSION: Far-field EGM can be reliably removed from uni-orig using our novel, least-squares algorithm. Compared with Bi and uni-orig, uni-res is more accurate in detecting low-voltage regions during AF. This approach may improve substrate mapping and ablation during AF, and merits further study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ragot et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=12). Unipolar voltage mapping with far-field cancellation (uni-res) vs. Bipolar voltage mapping (Bi) and unipolar voltage mapping without far-field cancellation (uni-orig) was evaluated on Area under the receiver operator curve for detecting low-voltage regions during AF (p=<.05). Unipolar voltage mapping with far-field cancellation yielded a greater area under the curve (0.80 vs 0.77; p<.05) for detecting low-voltage regions during AF compared with bipolar mapping.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: