Key result
An automatic wavelet-based electrogram onset delineator showed significant correlation (0.95, p=0.01) with manual reference annotations, yielding an error of 2.1 ± 10.9 ms.
Why the study?
Does an automatic wavelet-based EGM onset delineator accurately identify activation mapping compared to manual annotation in patients with PVCs?
Does an automatic wavelet-based EGM onset delineator accurately identify activation mapping compared to manual annotation in patients with PVCs?
Effect estimate: Correlation 0.95
p-value: p=0.01
An automatic wavelet-based EGM onset delineator performs comparably to manual annotation, potentially reducing processing time during ablation interventions.
May aid faster PVC activation mapping; leaves open prospective outcome validation.
Electroanatomical mapping (EAM) systems are commonly used in clinical practice for guiding catheter ablation treatments of common arrhythmias. In focal tachycardias, the ablation target is defined by locating the earliest activation area determined by the joint analysis of electrogram (EGM) signals at different sites. However, this is currently a manual time-consuming and experience-dependent task performed during the intervention and thus prone to stress-related errors. In this paper, we present an automatic delineation strategy that combines electrocardiogram (ECG) information with the wavelet decomposition of the EGM signal envelope to identify the onset of each EGM signal for activation mapping. Fourteen electroanatomical maps corresponding to ten patients suffering from non-tolerated premature ventricular contraction (PVC) beats and admitted for ablation procedure were used for evaluation. We compared the results obtained automatically with two types of manual annotations: one during the intervention by an expert technician (on-procedure) and other after the intervention (off-procedure), free from time and procedural constraints, by two other technicians. The automatic annotations show a significant correlation (0.95, p 0.01) with the evaluation reference (off-procedure annotation sets combination) and has an error of 2.1 ± 10.9 ms, around the order of magnitude of the on-procedure annotations error ( - 2.6 ± 6.8 ms). The results suggest that the proposed methodology could be incorporated into EAM systems to considerably reduce processing time during ablation interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alcaine et al. (2014) studied Non-tolerated premature ventricular contraction (PVC) (n=10). Automatic wavelet-based electrogram onset delineator vs. Manual annotations (on-procedure and off-procedure) was evaluated on Correlation and error of automatic annotations compared to evaluation reference (off-procedure manual annotations) (Correlation 0.95, p=0.01). An automatic wavelet-based electrogram onset delineator showed significant correlation (0.95, p=0.01) with manual reference annotations, yielding an error of 2.1 ± 10.9 ms.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: