Key result
Rock climbers exhibited greater resting brachial artery diameter (4.30 vs 3.79 mm, P<0.05) and peak reactive hyperaemic blood flow compared to untrained controls, indicating structural adaptation.
Why the study?
Does rock climbing induce structural and functional vascular adaptations in the forearm compared to untrained controls?
Cross-Sectional (n=16)
Does rock climbing induce structural and functional vascular adaptations in the forearm compared to untrained controls?
Absolute Event Rate: 4.3% vs 3.79%
p-value: p=< 0.05
Rock climbers exhibit structural vascular adaptations in the forearm, including larger brachial artery diameters and greater capillary filtration capacity, without differences in vascular function (FMD) compared to untrained controls.
May indicate structural forearm adaptations in climbers; leaves open causality versus selection bias, needing prospective trials.
Rock climbers perform repeated isometric forearm muscle contractions subjecting the vasculature to repeated ischaemia and distorted haemodynamic signals. This study investigated forearm vascular characteristics in rock climbers compared to healthy untrained controls. Eight climbers (CLIMB) (BMI; 22.3, s = 2.0 kg/m(2), isometric handgrip strength; 46, s = 8 kg) were compared against eight untrained controls (CON) (BMI; 23.8, s = 2.6 kg/m(2), isometric handgrip strength; 37, s = 9 kg). Brachial artery diameter and blood flow were measured, using Doppler ultrasound, at rest and following 5-mins ischaemia (peak diameter) and ischaemic exercise (maximal dilation) to calculate flow mediated dilation (FMD) and dilatory capacity (DC). Capillary filtration capacity was assessed using venous occlusion plethysmography. Resting (4.30, s = 0.26 vs. 3.79, s = 0.39 mm), peak (4.67, s = 0.31 vs. 4.12, s = 0.45 mm) and maximal (5.14, s = 0.42 vs. 4.35, s = 0.47 mm) diameters were greater (P < 0.05) in CLIMB than CON, respectively, despite no difference in FMD (9.2, s = 2.6 vs. 8.7, s = 2.9%). Peak reactive hyperaemic blood flow (1136, s = 504 vs. 651, s = 221 ml/min) and capillary filtration capacity (3.8, s = 0.9 vs. 5.2, s = 0.7 ml.min(-1).mmHg(-1).100 ml tissue(-1) × 10(-3)) were greater (P < 0.05) in CLIMB compared to CON, respectively. Rock climbers exhibit structural vascular adaptation compared to untrained control participants but have similar vascular function. This may contribute to the enhanced ability of climbers to perform repeated isometric contractions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thompson et al. (2014) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy rock climbers (n=16). Rock climbing vs. Untrained controls was evaluated on Resting brachial artery diameter (mm) (p=< 0.05). Rock climbers exhibited greater resting brachial artery diameter (4.30 vs 3.79 mm, P<0.05) and peak reactive hyperaemic blood flow compared to untrained controls, indicating structural adaptation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: