Key result
Dedicated LA-focused cine images eliminate the ~13 ml underestimation of LAVmax seen with standard images.
Why the study?
Routine CMR evaluation of LA volumes still uses standard LV-focused 2- and 4-chamber cine images, unlike 2D echocardiography where LA-focused views have improved accuracy.
Does the use of dedicated LA-focused long-axis views improve the accuracy of LA volumes and emptying fraction measured by CMR compared to standard LV-focused views?
Population
108 consecutive patients
Comparison
LA-focused vs standard LV-focused cine images vs short-axis cine stacks
Design
Observational comparative study
Authors
Loading...
May support dedicated LA-focused CMR views for accurate LA volumetry; leaves open effects on management and outcomes.
Observational (n=108)
Yes
Does the use of dedicated LA-focused long-axis views improve the accuracy of LA volumes and emptying fraction measured by CMR compared to standard LV-focused views?
Absolute Event Rate: 83% vs 72%
p-value: p=0.007
Dedicated LA-focused long-axis CMR cine images provide more accurate measurements of left atrial volumes and emptying fraction than standard LV-focused images, without significantly increasing scan or processing time.
Tondi et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Patients undergoing clinically referred cardiovascular magnetic resonance (n=108). Left atrial-focused long-axis cine images vs. Standard left ventricular-focused long-axis cine images was evaluated on Maximum left atrial volume (LAVmax) in ml (p=0.007). Dedicated left atrial-focused long-axis cine images eliminated the underestimation of maximum left atrial volume seen with standard images (bias 0 ml vs -13 ml compared to reference).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: