Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Although people live with uncertainty all their lives, only in recent years has critical, sustained attention been paid by the social sciences to how uncertainty figures in — and is arguably central to — attempts to make sense of the world and to act within it. Region-thinking and region-making efforts under the rubric of “Southeast Asia,” “Asia-Pacific,” “East Asia,” “Trans-Pacific,” and “Indo-Pacific” can be seen as attempts to manage the risks and uncertainties that attend the actions of major powers and the responses provoked by unfolding economic and political events. Regional perspectives have been important for understanding the contingency, historicity, and connectivity of Asian developments in politics, culture, and economy. These perspectives can be enriched by incorporating contributions from the humanities that have long been attentive to the workings and implications — aesthetic, ethical and political — of uncertainty. Social scientists have been inspired by literary studies to pay closer attention to the storytelling devices that shape the narratives that social sciences as well as political and economic actors create about politics and the economy. The art of border-raiding entails ranging freely across disciplines, regardless of the intellectual tariff barriers put up by various disciplines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Caroline S. Hau (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: